| |
| Religious Belief |  We might say at this juncture, it would indeed be at finite stages. Theoretically, this should mean the universe will finish at that time, and once again return to a nothingness. Or a basic diamond physics we spoke of. And although, for simple explanation we spoke candidly of diamond sunstance here on Earth, it should be remembered by the reader, on universal terms a much more significant carbon might be needed. This is still speculative, and shouldn't alter the postulation, as the principle is incorporated.
But as science analyses this concept, carbon 60, or C60 might be more appropriate as it contains little or no hydrogen. But only forensic laboratory tests can settle this argument. And scientific equipment is something I don't have access to. But what we can assume, is the endeavour we sought is justified by the theoretical hypothesis.
We wanted to demonstrate the validity of a theory that satisfies religious belief. We sought to make, what science said was impossible, God's entry to our universe possible. We hoped to show, where explicable, God could have an entry route laid down under prophecy and biblical teaching. And what we have achieved in this short work is probably the most profound piece of religious text; and we will call it religious text as science needs to understand bullying will not be tolerated; is the most profound contribution I've ever seen.
And there is a good reason why I say that. For without our rewrite of a big bang, religion, quite simply was not possible. But even in stating it, I do not wish to appear haughty. That would be wrong, profoundly wrong. The only thing I've done is bring an explanation to something that had no explanation. It was incredibly hard work, and I received no payment. I gave my time, about 15 years, to advance our thinking. And I have never claimed to be unequivocally right. As I said before, and make no apologies for saying so again, that might be arrogant to do so.
Yet, even with this rewrite, we come-up gainst possibly the hardest test of all; that of making a prediction to justigfy what I say here: We must place a prediction in, if there is to be a meteoric appraisal of our postulate. This is necessary for all involved: Theologians, cosmologists and scientists, and of course the ordinary man and woman in the street.
I've already stated, one prediction should be - an electrical current cannot be placed through a diamond. Not light, but electricityThis will show diamond does not apply to the laws of physics as we understand the way they should. Secondly, we must be able to construct, from constitutional particles (atoms) around us, a diamond. For if we can create diamond from that which surrounds us, then we can reverse the analogy and demonstrate, all that surrounds us can equally be created from diamond. These two predictions alone should vindicate my original belief.
But on cosmological terms, there must also be a justification of what we term, a fusion - infusion principle. Therefore, as we said a slow and stable release of matter creates new galaxies, and this point must naturally be the most dense place in the universe, a large array of pulsars a source in space of radio signals that pulsate in a rapid and regular rhythm, must be located. Further to this, towards the peripheral wall of the universe, large, giant red galaxies must be found. These should be old, ancient galaxies that have so greatly red-shifted: Displacement of the spectrum to longer wave-lengths in the light coming from receding galaxies, as their life cycle should nearly be complete. If this phenomena were discovered it might go some way to showing the postulate accurate; especially if accompanied by the belief of diamond construction from natural particles and the principle of not being able to pass an electrical current through a diamond compound.
In essence, we have ventured far deeper into religious belief, even from a scientific perspective, than science has, with its own postulate. We have demonstrated quite candidly how a nothingness can exist, produce a dimensional universe, incorporate quantum gravity, produce a theory of missing mass and allow the entire structure an ambit of destiny. Even if that destiny might still be shaped by God or Gods plural. And not once did we deal in ambiguity or ambivalence. We answered every question placed forth, and explained the reasons how and why events happen. We conveyed a belief based entirely on cause and effect. We constructed a chain reaction to allow one universe, through expansion and contraction, an ability to produce the next. Continued
The_Big Bang: Essay Paper 1
Before the Big Bang 1 |
|
| |
|
» 
