| |
| Christ, Son of God |  ration of universal edict, we might even assume, from a more Christian, christ son of god, perspective that this denomination of time, based entirely on a universal evaluation is what they termed in medieval times as: "God's time."(That for God to govern the universe, time must cease to exist, as God must be able to look equally forward - as he can backward, whilst governing the present!)
Therefore the theroy unfurling here will most certainly allow any would-be philosopher or cleric an opportunity to discover the fuller implications of Christian belief within the mentality of pantheism, and promote Christianity with some indecent haste.
But as we are concentrating this work for ufologists, that's another paper for another time.
And we must reluctantly concentrate our beliefs on that of ufology as promised under the principle of this doctrine.
We said, with special relativity, we could allow a clock to instantly start ticking. And this we hold too.
When this analogy is applied, we don't particularly challenge any of Einstein's belief, as it would be nonsense to do so. The evaluated criteria has been laid out before us, inspected and vindicated to the best of my knowledge.
However, from the ufologist's perspective, these universal set of physics fail to meet specific alternative criteria and allow the passage of any extraterrestrial craft over any sustained journey at the accelerated velocities it would need to journey from one star system to another.
Therefore, we now raise a very obvious question; one that has never been broached before under the laws of physics, and try to introduce some semblance of reality into a very contrived debate: Could there be two sets of physics which actually contradict one another, just as special relativity and ufology do?It's probably one of the most interesting questions ever posed to both science, philosophy, religion and ufology. For although these specific groups have been sniping at each other, the laws of physics themselves may hold the key to all their arguments; and only our intelligence might have missed some obvious clues. Could our universe really be all things to all people? The hypothesis is intriguing to say the least. And when I originally started my quest, I found the idea laughable. But then, when the evidence slowly emerged, that initial laughter turned to a sober realism.
There was almost a still, temperate sobriety that crossed my body as the thought fermented wildly in my mind. Initially, like many philosophers I found the subject matter of ufo activity somewhat strange to say the least.
I have even believed in the past, that perhaps they are no more than the workings of over active imaginations, with some innocent childlike qualities attached.
But as time lapsed, I too would become a convert.
Yet, the way I watched scientists treat ufologists stirred some sleeping beast inside me. To be perfectly honest, I found the esoteric attitude to the whole problem puerile at best.
Although I had a strong insight into special relativity at that juncture in time, I still couldn't help but see the demonisation of ufologists as anything other than an arrogant attempt of educated bullying. And I knew then that if we were to re-evaluate special relativity we would most certainly need some profound piece of thinking: Something only universal evaluation itself could contest. I was on my way to a universal court, higher than any of man's courts, and conclusive in its verdict. No room for appeal, and no ambit for mitigation. The questions I began asking were profound in their simplicity: (i) How could any possible ufo circumvent the velocity of light?
Special Relativity: Essay Paper 1
Creation
|
|
| |
|
» 
