| |
| Wormhole |  This logically means all events in the universe are equal to all other events, and no two individuals, regardless of their distance or duration could determine a time, any different than any other individual, even if they used a wormhole. Once time has been removed, the advantages of Time Travel become abundantly clear, and the very elegant statement by Stephen Hawking becomes clearer. When Stephen Hawking made his remarks, he didn't envisage a timeless universe, had he, he might have altered his views. For with a timeless universe, all events become possible all of the time. You have to visualise it like a video cassette slotted into your VCR.
It makes no difference whether you fast forward, rewind, standstill. Wherever the tape stops it will always play the same segment of film, the same pictures, the same soundtrack. It can never alter nor distort the pre-recorded tape. Our universe, if we remove time demonstrates the very same traits. Only rather than a VCR with convenient remote controll, we look to the laws of physics and the density of mass. Whenever a gravitational field crosses a certain section of space, the volume of mass distorts and a scene is played out. But how can we prove this?
The evidence for the changing of where light first breaks has an inbuilt prediction (see special relativity above) , but for a more visual recognition, the evidence is a touch more anecdotal. The Hubble telescope (pictured first page) undertook an experiment known as Deepfield. This experiement looked longingly at the darkest, deepest regions of space and was expected to show early galaxies composing themselves. The reason for this is simple, Einstein predicted is. What Einstein said was: "You can only ever look back along a tunnel of time. Never forwards." This meant only embryonic galaxies would be seen. But, confounding Einstein, and the laws of physics as science interprets them today, the Hubble telescope actually saw prefectly formed galaxies. Science now claims there's a problem with the telescope! That's euphemistic scientific speak for: "We haven't got a clue to what's going on?" Answers on a postcard!
Yet, I think I might have resolved the problem. By rewrting the the big bang and composing a universe, rather than letting it all explode at once, we might have a universe which is tracing its way back to its original point of inception. This would mean the future is preset, just waiting for us to have a look. It most certainly would explain the strange results from the Hubble telescope. This would also justify Stephen Hawking's view of Time Travel. When Stephen Hawking said: "You can't have Time Travel, because if you could they'd already be here telling us about it," Stephen Hawking missed one valuable point: They can't tell us about it because we live in dimensions (for use of a phrase) that prohibits them from doing so. Think of it like a ghost. People frequently witness ghosts, yet the said ghosts are always in the same place, doing the same thing: Why?
Well just maybe it's because the said ghost is merely an impression in the fabric of time. Perhaps the ghost sees us in their time, as equally as we see them in ours. A mirrored image of each other reflected over the centuries or millennia by a blip in the gravitational field!
If this is the case, then there is no logical, or good reason why we shouldn't quantify the particle physics and produce a gravitational field with a thermo-electro-magnetic field and look either backwards or forwards. Therefore, rather than Time Travel, what we get is Time Windows, an outlook on the past or future: although we wouldn't be allowed to interfere. We could watch, but not enter that period in history or the future.
Time Travel.
Time Travel: Previous
Time Travel: Essay
|
|
| |
|
» 
