| |
| Solar Eclipse |  this event by means of a solar eclipse. What I attempted, was to construct a prediction by increasing the level of gravity in another, distant part of our universe. I understood that as a moon crossed between the sun and planet, the star itself must condense slightly. This would cause the breakage of light, if central to both stars to lift as we observe it. Yet once the eclipse had passed, the pin-prick of light (a star) would naturally return to its former position.
I termed this possible event: The rise and fall of starlight on a secondary equation to a Doppler.
It might sound somewhat complex, but in reality it's not. It just basically means, a point of light in the night sky, (a star) will momentarily lift up, and then fall back to its original position as the predicted eclipse takes place. Nothing could be more simple to understand.
However, on a Doppler registration, (the change in frequency of pitch from a source to an observer), nothing would be more profound, especially for any ufologist hoping to vindicate ufological belief. At that precise moment, any vehicle could literally cross the universe in the blink of an eye, as gravity rather than light becomes its determinable velocity. It basically means, you may have any speed you wish!
Yet, if we showed this event plausible by predicting an eclipse, then not only could we assume space travel is possible in its ability to meet any velocity, but we will also show the world they may originate from.
The reason this happens is all to do with a Doppler registration.
To fully comprehend what we speak so frankly of, first you have to understand the belief science sponsors. Science sees a star as a body of mass. But when we speak of a breakage of light, central to any two bodies of mass, we create a mere holographic image that is massless. Therefore this point cannot be accurately measured as its calculation is already complete.
You might like to imagine this, for a simplification, as viewing yourself in the mirror, and assuming there's two of you. The analogy under this theorem is strikingly similar, yet subtly different. And it was this, that allowed me to appreciate the fact, that not only could we remove the velocity of light, but we could also cancel universal time, space time, space time curvature, fourth dimensional space time, and the Hubble constant: (That which shows the distancing of galaxies with a steady progession).
Or what we might term for simplicity sake, matter slowly expanding within our universe.
And the reason this belief arises is perfectly obvious if we assume stars not to be stars, but points of force between two stars, as their wave mechanics become appropriate at the right juncture.
What would happen is, as our planet loses its gravity, all points of force (starlight) distance themselves equidistantly. We might even argue, that if our planet was increasing its level of gravity, we would not see an expanding universe, but a collapsing universe.
This single postulate would literally throw the entire academic world into turmoil if proven correct. One simple reason for saying this is, if light is determined as a point of force, moving two directions simultaneous, then all observers, regardless of their position in the universe would witness all events equally, thus none may calculate a time any different from any other. What we might call a universal equality.
Basically it would show everywhere in our universe today, and therefore, you could never look down that proverbial tunnel of time.
To appreciate this analogy, we must assume two time frames enter the equation, or that time non-time parallel we spoke about previously. We have struck the promised divisibility between the two.
What we have done here by changing the point where light first emits, is show for us, and any other body of matter (mass) measured by its resistance to acceleration, time would apply under the laws of Einsteinian special relativity. A rocket might be inflicted by this principle, as no division is made between the rocket, and that space it travels amongst.
Yet if the universe itself offers a possibility of divisibility, and moves light from a point central to both bodies of mass (stars), then two observers would witness the said event together, thus our universe would have cancelled, or sequestrated time for them both.
To simplify this argument still further, so the reader might understand its clarity, we should use an Einsteinian thought experiment.
Einstein proposed a theory, which suggested, that if a clock raced towards an observer, through space at the speed of light, the observer would literally see time shrink. Independent observations here on Earth have indeed proved this particular theory accurate.
But that was before I chose to introduce Newtonian equal opposites. If we now include this belief, that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction, we might change that Einsteinian thought experiment to one of my own; and say:
Beyond Light Speed: Essay Paper 1
Faster Than Light 3
|
|
| |
|
» 
