| |
| Dark Matter and the Big Bang |  One of the unfortunate facts for the scientific community, and anybody else who wishes to promote the Big Bang singularity is, it has an elementary flaw in its construction: the theory itself collapses the moment any forensic investigation is mounted into its mechanics, and a painstaking search for universal missing mass is undertaken, even if some do say it exists as dark matter.
The reason the missing mass is so critical is because, without it, the universe, if it continues to expand at its present, accelerated rate, could become so thinly scattered throughout the universe, it would simply end-up as a nothingness, cold and empty, or what is known as The Big Chill.
Therefore, it becomes imperative to either discover why the mass is missing, or produce an alternative theory to satisfy the necessary criteria and locate all the mass in the universe.
The Big Bang was first discussed, and then debated at length in the early half of the nineteen seventies, as a theoretical hypothesis to understand how our mighty universe might having come into being from one devastating explosion.
Members of Bell laboratories USA detected a low audible background hiss in the universe, and instantly jumped to what seemed an irrefutable conclusion: This must be the inceptive point where our universe began life.
From a rudimentary appraisal, the theory seemed plausible, after all, if the universe did instigate itself from an initial point in space, where space became infinite as a singularity, there should at least be some remnant of the birth of such a cataclysmic act left over to identify its origin, and place of inception fusion.
Science termed this low, audible hiss, an echo, and forfeited any chance of a prize for originality.
However, when the idea of a Big Bang singularity is ruthlessly examined, as people who have a problem with this subject matter have done, one evident piece of the puzzle, which should be abundantly obvious with such a demonstrative theory, is noticeable by its absence: mass. If the universe began 15 billion years ago, as science states, with a Big Bang singularity, then naturally all the universal mass (a body measured by its resistance to acceleration) should be apparent.
We should be able to conclusively measure all the universal mass with modern scientific instrumentation. Unfortunately though, we can't. The majority of universal mass is not apparent, and any attempt to measure the mass with modern scientific instrumentation fails abysmally.
Therefore, I think we are justified in asking honestly why we can't measure all the mass that should be there if this event really did take place as suggested by the scientific community?
The chances are, we can't measure it because the Big Bang never actually took place, and the low audible hiss detected by Bell laboratories is no more than a figment of over active imaginations, and a scientific community desperate to validate their belief and place something which sounds credible in the public domain.
The probability is, what Bell laboratories heard, was no more than a reverberation of sound from all universal explosions, consolidated to a strategic point in the cosmos, which is then spun back at them, like echoes off a canyon wall.
Big Bang and Creation
The Big Bang 1
|
|
| |
|
» 
