| time travel | hiv - aids link found | mad cow disease | iceage | myra hindley | travel warning | anthology
A comprehensive website which deals in new, highly original theories on the universe, life in general and controversial subjects: Einstein, Hawking, The Big Bang, dinosaurs, martians, aliens, hindley and much, much more. Why not have a surf around and read something interesting to tell your mates. You never know, you might just find yourself doing the talking, rather than doing the listening! Think about it!      »  National Geographic
     »  Encyclopaedia Britannica
     »  Microsoft's Encarta
     »  Message Boards
Birth of Creation | Big Bang | Nothingness Found | God Discovered | Planets Found | Ten Commandments | Galaxies |
 
Return to my our home pageNew ScientistAdd Your Site To Our Links Section!tell us what you think...What's happening in the world? Find out with our news section.
Top Destinations Menu
 faminesAid Charities
 A WormholeTime Travel
Discovered.

 was stonehenge a parliament?Stonehenge
Wiltshire.

 The Accretion TheoryA new Planetary
Solar System

 Is there still intelligent life on marsLife on
Mars

Theories Here
  »  Accretion
  »  The Sun
  »  Aliens
  »  Dinosaurs
  »  Power A UFO
  »  Gravity
  »  Planets
  »  Earth

Text Essays
  »  Before Big Bang
  »  After Big Bang
  »  Singularity
  »  The Big Bang
  »  Beyond Light Speed
  »  Faster Than Light
  »  Special Relativity
  »  Moors Murders
  »  African Famines
  »  The Iceage
  »  Stonehenge
  »  Time Travel
  »  UFOs
  »  The Constant
  »  Solar System
  »  Velocity of Light
  »  The Red Planet
Info Section
  
Ask your question.Links
Copyright
Questions

Why not read the anthologyRead The
Book.

Albert EinsteinRelativity
Smashed!


  


Neutrons and Atomic Particles
light moves two ways joke on the universe imaginable, and fool it into believing that an event is taking place, when really it isn't. To understand what we hope to achieve, it's important we clarify our intentions. When we talk candidly of playing tricks on the universe, we must appreciate the severity of our attempts to produce that desired effect we need. If we assume our universe is carefully crafted, so its internal matrix's is designed and constructed to always retain an atomic parity. Or what we said was balanced forces.

We assume our universe is so perfect, its like a plate spinning on a magician's stick. If it ever dramatically slowed down, it might upset its balance and the whole thing may end-up in one huge heap in the corner.

Science might term this, a Big Crunch singularity: (The opposite of a Big Bang singularity). But let's suppose we could interfere with this perfect alignment, and place within it an extra weight. For our purposes we could use the density of atomic particles.

If we took a large nuclear reactor, and applied a strategy inside, where atomic particles had their weight diminished, say neutrons, we should produce an effect easily identifiable by the universe. You might like to think of it like balanced scales, only now another weight is placed on one end! If you were to realign your scales, you would need another weight proportionate to the first; to make them balance again. But our universe would have no such luxury, and so, to strike a parity it would quickly begin accelerating any increased weight under a belief extra volumes of mass would be introduced; if of course we keep in mind mass is measured by its resistance to acceleration.

We say at this point, if our universe did do this, parity or balanced forces would quickly return, and our universe would once again have obtained a comfortable weight. Yet for us, we now introduce that trickery we spoke of, for we will prohibit the universe from achieving its aims, by allowing both sections of a hypothetical vessel, as an example, to rotate as equal opposites.

And this would mean, regardless of the density inside the craft, no amount of acceleration may ever achieve balanced forces, as the sum total of our craft's production always reaches zero.

What we termed for easy recognition, as non-time.

To apply a convenient analogy for the reader we will simplify things still further, and show with a quick thought experiment what we mean.

Imagine an oyster, and in it is placed a piece of grit. We suggest this piece of grit upsets our oyster, and the one thing it would dearly love to do, is eject it. It would like to spit it out, and stop the annoyance. But the oyster faces a problem. Its construction refuses any attempt to dispel the offending material, and so, to satisfy the oyster, a pearl is spun.

We might like to now conclude, on universal dimension, the same principle applies. Our universe would consider any change in its universal density, in the same manner as an oyster irritated by a piece of grit. But our universe cannot spin a pearl, so therefore chooses another, more acceptable route. That of acceleration.

Yet as we devised a system where the sum total of all equations reach zero, regardless of any accelerant involved, our universe might consider this application, no more than an infinitely, unassailable task. The logical assumption to make is, no matter how fast the universe moves our craft, the desired effect would naturally be negligible, even if it moved the said vessel at a thousand times the velocity of light.

We could even assume, as we move gravity at this point, rather than light, a craft could travel from one side of the universe to the other in the blink of an eye, providing the atomic density in the craft reached a proportionate level of mass equivalent to that of our universe. We might even be able to determine the velocity as impulsion: (An accelerant determined by its weight not is duration). But although we have shown here how this new methodology is achieved by solid-

Build a UFO 
The Velocity Of Light 3 



back to the top of page
 © Copyright 1998-2004, New Theories. All rights reserved. This material is for personal use only. All the theories on this site are the intellectual property of NewTheories, and may not be reproduced or distributed without the prior written consent of the owner. For further information see:Copyright Information.  Or contact: email.  Return Home.  More Theories.