| |
| Mars |  It sounds incredible doesn't it, life on Mars, the red planet? For years academics have speculated about the presence of intelligent life on mars, from the Victorians who first witnessed long straight lines, believing them to be canals, to modern day philosophers who believe huge, carved martian faces lay as evidence to a once great civilisation in the rock face. And then there's me.
At the risk of ruining my reputation, which has taken me quite a few years to build, I've now taken one step farther than other academics, philosophers and theorists. I've built a theory on intelligent life still in residence beneath the martian surface. It sounds fantastic, even to the extent, where one of my colleagues called me: "As soppy as a box of frogs!"
Not prepared to be put off by a few nasty names, even if they are used in jest, I sought to build a model to prove what I say. As usual, with every piece of new theoretical observation I make, I can back up what I say with strong, anecdotal evidence. It's not idle speculation or a theory without substance. This is a well thought out piece of engineered science, with solid support from the surrounding solar-system.
My suspicion of intelligent life on mars was first awakened when I built a new, highly original theory on our solar-system and demonstrate how our solar-system, and every other solar system throughout the universe is a carefully moulded, evolutionary event.
I wanted to escape the narrow parameters laid down by science and produce a piece of cosmological engineering so refined, it would leave us breathless at its construction.
To achieve this I set about by reinventing the atomic matrix of the solar system. I converted the star in to a vortex, what we might term for simplification: a fused black hole, rather than the current model which suggests our star, the sun is a globular burning ball of gas.
It seemed heresy at first, but as the idea fermented lucidly in my imagination, I gradually saw the benefits. Not only would it satisfy an evolutionary event, making life on earth on thing but an accident, but it would also justify the accretion theory: (our sun and the solar system was built from a disc of dust.) At present this scientific model has a downside, as the sun doesn't produce enough gravitation to build the outer planets uranus and neptue.
The model works under this basis. If the sun is a vortex rather than a globular burning ball of gas, it has the ability to regulate its temperature rather than being constant as science sees it today. The fluctuating temperature allows gravitation to be extended throughout the solar system at different levels during its own history. When a body of matter fuses with the star, we have high levels of gravity, effecting everything from the plantes themselves, to the very minutia, such as atoms and gases. However, when the star (sun) cools down as the matter is burnt, gravity is lost and the planets begin to fall closer to the star. This also expliains how ice age happen.
What you should have instantly worked out from the theory is, a regulatory solar system is built, with the hot as a vortex at its heart, and the surrounding solar system material falling progressively closer towards it. Or what we can now term, an evolutionary solar-system. No getting lucky, no being in the right place at the right time. Just a carefully constructed system of propogation deduced through heat and gravity. Everything is effected by its atomic weight, and refines itself due to temperature regulation. However, if planets are built in this manner, one elementary flaw persists: we should see a string of planets at various stages in their evolutionary development. But we don't, why?
Under my theory, the back to the top of page |
| |  | | © Copyright 1998-2004, New Theories. All rights reserved. This material is for personal use only. All the theories on this site are the intellectual property of NewTheories, and may not be reproduced or distributed without the prior written consent of the owner. For further information see:Copyright Information. Or contact: email. Return Home. More Theories. |
 |
| |
|
» 
