| |
| Earth |  Do we really believe planet Earth is the only planet in the universe with intelligent life upon it? Do we believe we just got lucky as the scientific community state, because we found ourselves in the right place at the right time? I doubt it very much.
Science suggests there are few other planets around other stars merely because a Doppler registration would detect them if they were there. As it doesn't, we must assume other solar systems remain baren.
Yet, if we were outside our solar system, looking back, and made the same measurement with a radio telescope, we wouldn't see a solar system which got lucky once, but a solar system which got lucky nine times. And I think it inconceivable to believe, we got lucky nine times, whereas other solar systems didn't get lucky at all. Maybe there is something wrong with our interpretation of the universe.
Two other theories on this site might just show how we have things wrong. In my rewrite of Einsteinian special relativity I show how to change the point where light first breaks.
I say it first appears between two bodies of mass and moves two directions simultaneous. And this new theory is absolutely crucial in understanding what I say in a moment. Because, if light does first originate at a point of force between two bodies of mass, then naturally we wouldn't be able to measure beyond that point.
Imagine two people with a large wall between them, infinitely high, infinitely wide. One person has a tennis ball. They throw it to the other person, but all the ball can do is hit the wall. What happens? Well, the ball bounces back to them, and regardless of how often they throw the ball, the person on the other side of the wall will never receive it.
Suppose the ball contained a message inside to let the other person know you exist: whould they ever find out if they can't receive the ball? The chances are not.
Therefore, if we can't make contact with the person on the otherside of the wall, we might deduce they don't exist at all. And it's this inpenetratable wall in space created by our own body of mass which would prohibit our understanding of what is out there, thus we need to circumvent it. But how?
What I decided to do was build an anomymoly into my theory so we could see who stands on the other side of our universal wall. I constructed a measurable prediction for my theory. What I said is this: if a point between two bodies of mass (stars) is indeed arbitrary, then an eclipse, either lunar or solar will cause the point of light we see in the night sky as a star, to fluctuate.
It will either rise or fall depending on whether a solar or lunar eclipse takes place. The point of light will lift and then return to its original position if a solar eclipse takes place, but will fall and the rise if a lunar eclipse takes place.
A simple measurement to prove the theory accurate.
More on PlanetsPlanets Continued
|
|
| |
|
» 
