| |
| Equations and Numbers |  principle of trust, that trust of ourselves. It's all too easy to lose faith, and simply back away, because someone else's theory has been established. It really is a tremendous shame. But to return to our clinical, some might even say, absolute prediction to determine our accuracy.
If we assumed all solar systems are strikingly similar to our own, we would have to assume each contains a multitude of planets. Theoretically under our analysis, we decided we could not see these planets, because two eliptical solar systems moving in a mirrored fashion to one another, would off set each other's planetary movement so perfectly, the equation should already be calculated. In other words, the sum total would always total zero if measured. It becomes a predetermined universal set of numbers that all universal sums should logically equate too. It's only if we throw in an anomaly that identifiable traits become obvious. Or what we might call: Secondary equations. A secondary equation becomes an identifiable feature if a primary equation: A first set of numbers has already had its value calculated.
We therefore have to search diligently for what might cause this secondary factor to happen. We said starlight's position always becomes determined by natural volumes of mass, and so, the only logical assumption to make, is a secondary equation could only ever be created by this event happening. If we assume those other solar systems have other planets around them, which automatically become punctuated with their own indigenous satellites, we must also assume, that when an eclipse takes place, it will produce a natural condensing on their star. This means that star will automatically capitulate and envelope high levels of mass during the duration of any solar eclipse. Alternatively, during any lunar eclipse it might induce a lower volume of mass and produce an equal opposite to that of what we have just discussed. If science challenged us at that point, we could tell them our theory is provable simply by using a Doppler measurement to test it.
If we advised them to point their telescopes at the stars, and wait, eventually they would see one of three events. The first would prove us wrong. This we might even conclude as a non-event.
That basically means the stars atomic matrix would not really change as it is monitered, and it most certainly would not relocate its position on a cosmological basis, except to distance itself under a Hubble effect.
With a natural equidistance built in of course. But as this process would be constant, we could assume the event would not be purveyed to us as any brief encounter. The second is a rise and fall of starlight.
This event would be so profoundly significant, that not even I could imagine the full implication or repercussions it might entail. But what we could be certain of, is science and cosmology would never be observed as quite the same again.
To witness this monumental event we would have to carefully monitor our night skies, wait for a solar eclipse to take place in a distant solar system and watch as starlight lifts itself higher, then relocates to its former position once the event has passed. Option three would be the direct opposite of this event. During a lunar eclipse, starlight would logically fall, and then automatically move back to its former position afterwards. If either option two or three took place, and was witnessed doing so, then our ability to bring spacecraft to planet earth would be proven unequivocally. And that presents us with some major headaches.
We can only second guess at the advanced nature of other civilisations and their intentions. They might be friendly. On the other hand they might be hostile. No on can know. But what we can ascertain from this brief summary of what might be our future, is we will one day visit them, and transmit all the same fears and woes as they do for us. But before we go anywhere, we must first protect those on board their spacecraft whom might wish to make that epic voyage of discovery. So how do we achieve that?
Quite simply, it becomes very much the same as what we have just discussed, the sequestration of time to remove gravitational influences. We have shown on a couple of different occasions now how we remove universal time, space time. Space time curvature. fourth dimensional space time and the Hubble
Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Back to how to build a drive system for spacecraft |
|
| |
|
» 
