| |
| Laws of Physics |  But if we view the nothingness from a universe term, we emerge with a different interpretation. We see conclusively the entire universe applies inextricably to the laws of physics: That branch of science which deals with the mechanics, dynamics, light, heat, sound, electricity, and magnetism of natural events.
But, if we could exclude these universal characteristics from the equation, we could show that a universe that does not apply to these mechanics cannot exist, even though it is still there. The laws of physics lay dormant ready and waiting to be awoken!
But to do so, we must first search for a substance that would satisfy the basic needs of the laws of physics, which are easily explained. And that substance must show how the elementary laws of physics do not apply, but must also show they can apply with a little processing, and yet simultaneous must reflect convincingly everything we envisage around us today. And that alone suggests we seek a carbonous compound, as everything here is carbon based: You; me; everything!
However, in doing so, we also wish to include, not just the compound based elements that describe the universe, its galaxies in formation, the productivity of its stars, and the multitude of various planets that no doubt fill it: But we also need to sequestrate time, to leave only God's time. God's time basically means no time, for God must be equally able to look forwards as God can looks backwards whilst governing the present, and the only way to achieve this, is to make everywhere today.
This confiscation of time is merely temporary, as time does need to be reintroduced as individual packages later on. We must emphasize that distinction between us as bodies of mass moving through the universe, and the universe itself which retains an ubiquity in all places simultaneous.
By that, I mean we will run parallel time frames within our universe. And by doing so, we can show, while we, or any other piece of mass, a body measured by its resistance to acceleration does, as special relativity suggests, have individual packages of time, the evolution of our noble universe does not.
For simplification we might say, although individual elements moving within a universal field have individual time frames, a surrounding electromagnetic field may not have time frames. Therefore, from a nothingness, time can be composed under a premiss of composure. And from this, we might allow an ability for the universe to decompose.
So what is a nothingness, that substance predicted be 3rd century theologians made of?
Quite simply it is a diamond vitrescent nutation, or what you might understand as an ordinary diamond here on earth: Although on universal terms it will contain subtle differences. These differences will apply to a more rigorous scrutiny. But as these aspects of carbon, including C60 might be vastly too complex to discuss, we will use, for an easy recognition, a basic substance everyone can comprehend, or our debate becomes too intricate.
If we imagine an entire universe constructed as a solid block of diamond, we might be forgiven for placing forwards this theory. On first assumption it seems crazy to postulate universal theory based around an elementary substance so obvious. But when we delve more deeply in to its workings, we find some strange and illusive powers.
As I previously mentioned, everything in the universe is carbon based, and diamond in its purist form, is absolute carbon. This means, not only could we create everything in existence today from a solid block of diamond, but we could also show how, diamond allows us to quickly evaluate a true potential for universal dimensions. But to do that we must discuss a principle where we perceive not a singular universe, but universes plural. Or what we might term multi-universal production.
Anthology forward one page back one page
|
|
| |
|
» 
