Again, this basic fact never prohibited anyone from some mad rush to justify their own belief, and just like rocket technology, that cannot defy special relativity, there is no foundation for broaching the subject of dinosaur extinction through meteorite impaction.
This belief is public misinformation and the belief it is public misinformation is vindicated when we view the latest martian probe launched to coincide with the movie "Independence day". A blaze of publicity, espoused the two. Conveniently, a meteorite was discovered in Antartica, we are told, which showed us how life was in abundance on the red planet millions of years ago. But no one was ever informed, the meteorite in question was actually ten years old, had been sitting at the back of a cupboard gathering dust, and the concentrate of fossil life inside was just as abundant down here, as it is up there. Public duped, money obtained, movie sold, science happy! What a world: God bless America.
Yet, the real facts, are somewhat more disturbing.
We can continue with our theory, where planetary evolution becomes the mainstay of our belief, we would see a planet, as it moves in towards the star, slowly shrinking in dimension. If this process continues, then residule landmass, as gas runs away, shows what might have really happened to the dinosaur and other life.
Let's imagine, a large gas giant, like Jupiter, its surface thick in early hot gases, we can understand, growth of living organism might accelerate beyond its natural growth cycle and produce giant species. This belief also give us reasons to assume dinosaurs skin never obtained fur, as heat would forbid the event. But with a planet moving cyclically towards the star, an inner vacuum would suck the surface down. We might believe this causes crater construction, for when the planet turns, yet pulls simultaneous, the surface must collapse.
If we look skywards today, we can see this pitting on the moon surface, the martian surface and other such bodies scattered throughout the solar-system. And we might be justified at that point to ask why haven't these impacting meteors caused such a peppering of our own surface, and say, as long as we have a natural fluid rain this process will not occur as the surface of our world is structurally sound; except those areas where water's not apparent.
As well as puncture wounds, designed to make us believe they are craters caused by impacting heavenly bodies, we could also ask how those places like the grand canyon formed? It's the same principle, only with a different shape scarred. As are our oceans, ravines, gully's and everything else indented on our surface. And the only difference between those symmetrical puncture wounds alleged to have killed off the dinosaurs on earth, and the more obscure shape of other surface structural collapse, is the border identification.
But we can easily explain that, by gravitational forces, during highly accelerated periods in the planet's history.
If, as the volume of mass to our star increases, then the vacuum inside the earth will theoretically collapse its surface, in a circular depreciation. This theory also naturally explains all crater construction, and removes any possibility of large asteroids impacting against ours, or anyone else's planetary surface.
As temperature from the star builds, a pitting on the surface becomes identifiable with elementary gravitational law, and the process of spin. We might even consider this event happening when we look at crop circles. Others say they're made by UFOs. Although, I personally believe, others responsible for them. However, if this process of surface collapse continues on forming planets, and liquid gas runs away, continued