| |
| Astronauts in Space |  could the mineshaft theory apply if astronauts were falling in space under a principle of equivalence: (in weightless environment)? Surely, there would be less gravity, not more, and as the astronaut fell through space without the earth's gravitational pull affecting his body, it wouldn't affect his eyesight either. We must assume the astronauts eyes are stuck in his head, the head is glued to his body, and the lot of them are inextricably linked. I concluded the mineshaft theory wrong. It had to be less gravity which caused the absence of light, not more gravity.
If this was the case, then I knew we had some very serious thinking to do. If light was produced, on demand by an influential body of matter, then a single repositoryand receptor was not enough to motivate the current theoretical observations we utilise today. I decided to seek an arbitrary point for light to manifest, and was shocked at what I discovered: the fact light could move two directions simultaneous, and fluctuating bodies of mass could push the arbitrary light position along different lengths of the scale.
But was there any supporting evidence. I would have settlled at that juncture in time, for even anacdotle evidence. Then I remembered, light through water moves at a much slower velocity than through a vacuum. Of course it does.
And as there's less gravity in water, I knew the hypothesis was more than just an outlandish proposal. I knew it was something big. But just how big would only become apparent when the full evaluation, and prediction was built. By including a prediction based on the mass - volume level, and showing how we might measure the said prediction by increasing the volume of mass on the star, I also understood the reason why we don't currently detect planets via a
Doppler registration. I reasoned, that if we do only ever measure a point of force between two stars, then the sum-total of the equation must always be calculated. ven if there was planetary movement in another solar system, the glitch of the plate's movement around the star would not alter the frequency, as they move as mirrored elipses of each other. It was then I included the anonymoly of eclipse within the equation.
I termed this for easy recognition: a secondary equation to the Doppler, bearing in mind, the primaray equation (the planets motion and movement around the star) had already calculated itself in conjunction with a reciprocal body. But moreover than this, the thought
which leapt out at me was, there must be planets around every star we see in the nightsky, and the only stars not to have planets around them, must be to
Beyond Light Speed: Essay Paper 1
Special Relativity 1 Special Relativity 2 Special Relativity 3 Special Relativity 4 Special Relativity 6
|
|
| |
|
» 
